HIGHWAY ECONOMY
INTRODUCTION:
Governments
have, of necessity, provided certain facilities that the private sector could
not furnish. Among them are highways and public transportation. The intents of
the expenditure for highways are to raise the level of the entire economy by
providing for ready transportation of goods; to assist in problems of national defense;
to make easier the provision of community services such as police and fire
protection, medical care, schooling, and delivery of the mails; and to open
added opportunities for recreation and travel. Highways benefit the landowner because
ready access makes his property more valuable. Their improvement benefits the
motor-vehicle user through reduced cost of vehicle operation, savings in time,
reduction in accidents, and increased comfort and ease of driving. On the other
hand, road improvements consume resources, including land, which might be used for
other productive purposes by individuals or by government and the vehicles
travelling produce air pollution and noise. From the point of view of resources use, then, highways can be
justified only if, in net sum, the consequences are favorable-that is, if cost
reductions to highway users and other beneficiaries of the improvement exceed
the costs, including some allowance for the return on the money invested. There
are as has been indicated before, numerous other factors to be considered, but
this chapter focuses on the economic or resource-use phases.
Highway economy was under discussion
over a century ago. W.M Gillespie, professor of civil engineering at Union
College, in his Manual of the Principles and Practice of Road Marking, stated
that “A minimum of expenses is of course highly desirable; but the road which
is truly the cheapest is not the one which has cost the least money, but the
one which makes the most profitable returns in proportion to the amount
expended upon it.”
The first detailed attention to
highway economy developed about 40 years ago at lowa State College. It focused
largely on the relative economy of various roads surfacing and, later, on the costs
of motor-vehicle operation. The advent of the state wide planning surveys with the
masses of data developed by them brought attention to many other factors of
importance to the overall problem. Even so, attention to highway economy as a
topic for detailed research and analysis has been small and sporadic. An accepting
was that economic comparisons of alternative routes on the Interstate System
were required by federal regulations. Many of these were based on the so-called
Red-Book, developed by the AASHO Committee on the Highway Design. Further impetus
for economic analysis on federal-aid projects many come through the Federal-Aid
Highway Act of 1970 (Sect. 186) which required that in 1972 the Federal Highway
Administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment